Built · ImpactHook integration on the roadmap
The committee verification path

Pantheon: a standards committee for every milestone

A milestone gate is only as good as the judgment behind it. Pantheon lets a funder convene a review committee for each milestone: standards agents, domain experts, and a dedicated Critic. They review the evidence and return a signed, reasoned verdict that releases the tranche. Don't trust, verify.

A marketplace for verifiable expertise

Pantheon mints experts, and historical or archetypal figures, as intelligent NFTs (ERC-7857). You assemble them into a committee on demand and get a signed, reasoned verdict on any claim. For ImpactHook, the claim is “this milestone was met.”

People and agents, together

A single verifier can be a person or an agent. A committee is both at once: expert agents do the first pass, a human Critic and in-country reviewers keep oversight, and no single party decides alone. This is the “humans + agents” verification path.

Who sits on the committee

The funder picks the seats

Standards-trained agents do the first pass, human experts and a local reviewer keep oversight, and an adversarial Critic tries to refute the evidence. They deliberate and converge on one signed verdict. No single party decides alone.

Under reviewMilestone 2 · “Clean-water well installed” · Agua Limpia, Chiapas
Standards agentValues figure (iNFT)Human expertAdversarial Critic
Convention on the Rights of the Child
Principles for Digital Development
Digital Public Goods Standard
Child-safeguarding (RD4C)
SDG indicators
Mother Teresa
Domain expert
Local, in-country reviewer
The Critic
The committee returns one signed verdict
Milestone 2 verified · Committee agrees · Critic: no objection · verdict 0x9f2a…c41d ↗ → tranche releases
How a verdict is reached

From evidence to release

01A funder convenes the committee for a milestone
02Each seat reviews the evidence against its standard
03The Critic tries to refute it
04The Aggregator weighs the verdicts
05The Notary signs the verdict onchain
06The matching tranche releases
Five roles

Every decision has an author

Roles are explicit, so a verdict is never an anonymous black box. The adversarial Critic is the most important detail: it builds skepticism into the system and preempts impact-washing.

Coordinator

Convenes the committee the funder configured and runs the review.

Validator

Checks the evidence against its assigned standard or domain and proposes a verdict.

Critic

Adversarial seat: tries to refute the evidence and surface what is missing or overstated.

Aggregator

Weighs the seats' verdicts into a single, reasoned decision.

Notary

Signs the verdict and its rationale and records it onchain.

Why a committee, and why now

It answers the obvious question a funder asks: who decides a milestone is met? A committee of named, standards-anchored seats, with a Critic, is more credible than a single oracle, and it encodes public standards as a digital public good. Pantheon itself is built; wiring it into ImpactHook as a verification path is the Growth-stage roadmap.

ERC-7857 iNFT0GENSGensynBuilt at ETHGlobal OpenAgents